data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a86e7/a86e78ffac993cfeb4ef22e47c960b2a7bdbada2" alt="Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1b95/a1b9507646f5911f6e2ddcc1b9c3ef26e49548d2" alt="Send by email Send by email"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b1e05/b1e05f2c8c3151e1a6c58bb737a69426d57f4399" alt="PDF version PDF version"
EXCERPTS
Many other countries -- including Sweden and Finland, which have much lower child poverty rates -- have also experienced sea changes in work and family life: more children living with single parents, young people in school longer, diminished labour force opportunities for young adults, etc. (Ending Child Poverty: A Promise Unfulfilled - Nov. 23).
The evidence shows that while, as sociologist John Myles observes, family formation may be unlikely to respond to public policy, public policies -- child care, housing, income support, education, labour policy -- make a big difference in how children live. Perhaps it would make more sense not to dismiss redistributive policies so summarily as "only a small part of the story."
Martha Friendly, Childcare Resource and Research Unit, National Partner, Campaign 2000
- reprinted from the Globe and Mail