data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a86e7/a86e78ffac993cfeb4ef22e47c960b2a7bdbada2" alt="Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1b95/a1b9507646f5911f6e2ddcc1b9c3ef26e49548d2" alt="Send by email Send by email"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b1e05/b1e05f2c8c3151e1a6c58bb737a69426d57f4399" alt="PDF version PDF version"
Excerpted from abstract
The recession shadowing the COVID-19 pandemic has been frequently characterised as a “shecession,” implying disproportionately negative effects for women. Yet the crisis might more accurately be called a “momcession,” as women’s work losses were driven in large part by the outcomes of mothers specifically. The OECD’s 2020 Risks that Matter survey presents cross-national evidence that when schools and childcare facilities shut down, mothers took on the brunt of additional unpaid care work – and, correspondingly, they experienced labour market penalties and stress. These findings serve as another reminder that governments must consider inequalities in unpaid work and take a gender-sensitive approach when building their policy responses to the COVID-19 crisis.