data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a86e7/a86e78ffac993cfeb4ef22e47c960b2a7bdbada2" alt="Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1b95/a1b9507646f5911f6e2ddcc1b9c3ef26e49548d2" alt="Send by email Send by email"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b1e05/b1e05f2c8c3151e1a6c58bb737a69426d57f4399" alt="PDF version PDF version"
Excerpted from abstract:
Increased investment in publicly-funded pre-kindergarten (pre-K) in the USA has come with a concomitant focus on teacher professionalization. Pre-K policies and professionalization efforts often fail to acknowledge that they are layered upon a history of previous policies. New policies are inscribed onto this “discursive archive.” The intersection of a new policy and this discursive archive, viewed through the lived experiences of two pre-K teachers, is the focus of this article. Using critical policy analysis as a framework, I interrogate how a new pre-K policy in Lakeville, Wisconsin, “made up” the pre-K professional in particular ways. Lakeville’s policy came with a new conceptualization of the pre-K professional, framed in terms of particular credentials, pedagogies, and ways of being with children. I explore how this view of the pre-K professional made up two pre-K teachers by shaping their professional and material realities. The use of critical policy scholarship, which recognizes that policy is “permeated with power,” provides a way to understand Lakeville’s pre-K policy as more than an intervention into practice. Instead, it shaped teachers’ subjectivities by creating new norms and boundaries around how teachers were to be and act as pre-K professionals, which they took or resisted in particular ways.